![]() ![]() I do not recall ANYONE quoting a WG rep nor providing a link to any official statements or dev blogs. Jack claimed to have heard the "simplify" explanation from someone he could not remember and from someplace he could not recall. I recall the discussion to which you refer. ![]() You don't wont to discuss it but you want to add unverified information to the discussion? Why would one not consider those to be contradictory positions? I'm also not interested in having that kind of discussion at the moment. I never said nor implied anything towards such a believe, nor the contrary, in here. ![]() Originally posted by casualsailor:If you don't believe they are removing economic bonuses from camouflages and signals flags then what do you think they mean by the following? That came out of left field. After all this is Wargaming we are talking about. How much of this was information they got from their contacts at Wargaming and how much was speculation I could not say.īut, IN MY OPINION, the idea that they are doing this for cosmetic reasons doesn't pass the smell test. This was about the same time as Wargaming was nerfing the Missouri's credit earning potential. Likewise after a couple of years the abundance of credits fails to motivate them to renew their Premium Accounts. ![]() It seemed that player which purchased an annual Premium Account and played every day were amassing so many credits that they were no longer feeling the credit crunch which motivates players to purchase Loot Crates of credits in order to purchase Tech Tree ships. IDK, a couple of their CCs before the Great CC Exodus stated that Wargaming was concerned that people had too many credits. Originally posted by juujbee:if you play t5-7 in co op you still make good credits but t8-10 you make almost nothing now what was the change that brought this about? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |